Essay/Term paper: 'to cut or not to cut- dealing with the national debt'

Essay, term paper, research paper:  Management

"It"s time to clean up this mess." Famous last words heard from the mouths of
many different politicians when talking about the national debt and the budget deficit.
Our debt is currently $4.41 trillion and we have a budget deficit of around $300 billion
and growing. Our government now estimates that by the year 2002 the debt will be
$6.507 Trillion. While our politicians talk of balancing the budget , not one of them has
proposed a feasible plan to start paying down the debt.
In the early days of our government debt was considered to be a last resort. In
1790, when Alexander Hamilton, as secretary of the Treasury, made his first report on the
national debt of the United States, he estimated it at close to $70 million. After
alternately rising and falling, the debt stood at only $4 million, or 21 cents per capita, in
1840. That was the lowest point ever reached by the public debt of the U.S. After 1840 it
rose to a peak, in the last year of the Civil War, of almost $2.68 billion and a per capita
figure of $75.01. The only justification for debt of any significant amount was a war. By
1900 this had been reduced to under $1 Billion. By 1919, the end of World War I, the
debt had climbed to $25.5 Billion. In each of the following years the debt was reduced,
and by 1930 stood at $18.1 Billion. With the collapse of Wall Street in 1929, the country
(debt history: 1850 to 1950)
fell into the Great Depression, which lasted until 1940. At that time the debt had climbed
to $51 Billion. By the end of World War II the debt was $269 Billion.
Again the government worked to reduce the debt, and by 1949 it was $252.7
Billion. At that point the Korean War started, sending the debt to $274 Billion by 1955.
Since then, there has been no serious effort to pay down the debt. The main point to be
made was that on three separate occasions a major debt reduction effort had been made,
but in the past 55 years in spite of much arm-waving there have been no similar results.
The U.S. debt is divided into two major kinds of loans, marketable and
nonmarketable. The former provides about 52 percent of the total and is made up of
bills, notes, and bonds that can be traded; the latter includes U.S. savings bonds,
foreign-government-owned securities, and government account securities that are
redeemable but not tradable. Maturity of this debt ranges from less than a year to over
20 years, with the average maturity about 3 years. More than half of the debt, however,
is short term, maturing in less than a year. A ceiling is placed on U.S. federal debt, and
Congress must enact new legislation to raise the ceiling. Between 1981 and 1990 the
ceiling was raised from about $1.08 trillion to about $4.15 trillion.
Unfortunately at the end of 1995 we reached the ceiling again, and Congress
refused to raise it. They felt that it had become too much, and there was a government
shutdown for a few days in November. Not only was this an inconvenience to many
people, it also accounted for an estimated $63 million a day in lost productivity, and
almost double that in lost tax revenue.
Due to the threat of this, Clinton has a plan to balance the budget by 2005. This
plan includes a projected $1.1 trillion spending cut over the next ten years, slow the
growth of spending on Medicare and Medicaid, trim social and farm programs, close a
number of corporate tax loopholes and retain the package of middle-class tax cuts he
proposed earlier. He also specified that programs such as Social Security, education, and
training would be immune from such cuts. He did warn though, "Make no mistake-- in
other areas, there will be big cuts, and they will hurt. This was June of 1995, and at the
end of Fiscal Year 1996, the national debt growth was $80 billion higher than previous
projections, with a final debt increase of $331 billion.

Where does this money go? This happens to be the most popular question asked,
yet the one nobody has a definite answer to. Out of all of the places the government
spends money, more than 50% goes to three main areas: defense, Social Security, and
Medicare and Medicaid, all of which combined account for between $750 and $900
billion per year. In the case of national defense, there are a few different points to be
made in justification of these outrageously high numbers. First, the costs in the 1940s
and 50s due to both World War II and the Korean War. Next comes the costs of the War
in Vietnam in the mid-1960s and 1970s along with LBJ"s Great Society Programs. This
trend of big spending continued on through the until the end of the 1980s under Reagan"s
Cold War programs. With the Cold War over, and the United States recognized as the
world"s only superpower, the defense budget is now being cut. But despite these cuts,
experts estimate that up through the year 2005, we will spend at least $250 billion a year
on national defense.
Social Security is yet a different story. Social Security has become the linchpin of
the Federal Government. Every politician in Washington knows that Social Security will
eventually fall, but very few will actually propose a budget that cuts out Social Security
completely. For those who do, any such plan is shot down immediately. Since its
conception in the 1950s, Social Security has done nothing but grow, and this year will
cost somewhere in the neighborhood of $330 to $350 billion. If that"s not enough, it is
projected that by 2005, the program will balloon to almost $450 billion. That"s a 28%
increase in less than 10 years.
Medicare and Medicaid are also untouchables in the federal budget, although in
Clinton"s new plan, he plans to cut the growth of both equally. While exact numbers
aren"t available for Medicaid, Medicare is soaring at the same rate as Social Security.
Right now, Medicare costs about $160 billion. In ten years, it will grow at an alarming
rate up to over $270 billion. That is a 68% growth rate. If this trend continues, Medicare
will reach $500 billion within 25 years. That"s a lot of money for health care.
As for the rest of the money, the bulk of it goes to programs such as income
security, health, education, and transportation among other projects. About $220 billion
goes towards interest we pay on the debt, and as our national debt keeps rising so will
this number. If the debt grows to the amount predicted by Leon Panetta, Clinton"s Chief
of Staff, $6401 billion, or to the size that some economists believe, in the excess of
$7000 billion, this number will soar higher and higher each year.
As the earlier graph pointed out, our national debt is not going to decrease by
itself. What this country needs is a compromise between Congress and the President, no
matter which President. Some experts feel that it is necessary that we side with one party
or the other (www.nationaldebt.com). Currently we have a Republican Congress and a
Democratic President. This isn"t going to help make the situation any easier. As a
matter of fact, in recent years the measure of annual deficit is determined inversely by the
amount of money that the government can loot from the Social Security Trust Fund and
the Federal Employees' Trust Funds plus 148 other trust funds. It has little or no
relationship to the fiscal management of the government's officials. The more trust fund
money they can plunder, the less the deficit will be, but the more the debt will increase.
The best comparison that can be made to the national debt is an enigma. If the
government tries to decrease it, somebody is going to be mad over what program is being
cut. The more the government spends, the more people complain that it is spending too
much. There is no balance, and that is why it makes elected officials so indecisive about
their views on the debt, they want to get re-elected. One final thought, balancing the
budget will eliminate the deficit, but it will not stop the growth of the debt, and the debt
is what we pay interest on, not the deficit. If there had been no deficit during the 1990's,
the debt would still have increased by $1 Trillion. Seem scary? Obviously we need
immediate action, with minimal bickering.









Works Consulted
Clinton Outlines Plan To Balance Budget By 2005; Melissa Healy; Los Angeles Times;
June 14 1995
"National Debt"; Encarta On-Line Encyclopedia 1996
Http://www.cnn.com
Http://www.nationaldebt.com