+ 1-888-787-5890  
   + 1-302-351-4405  
 
 
 
 

Essay/Term paper: Euthanasia and the robert latimer case

Essay, term paper, research paper:  Politics

Free essays available online are good but they will not follow the guidelines of your particular writing assignment. If you need a custom term paper on Politics: Euthanasia And The Robert Latimer Case, you can hire a professional writer here to write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written essays will pass any plagiarism test. Our writing service will save you time and grade.



Euthanasia and the Robert Latimer Case

Euthanasia is undoubtedly an issue that plagues the minds of those living with
children or adults who are severely disabled. Rarely is one found to have a "
neutral' outlook upon it; that is, a side must be chosen, for or against. It is
too delicate a topic to be "in the middle' about. Over the years, cases
involving euthanasia have caused massive controversies as to whether or not it
is feasible to take the life of another human being in order to "put them out of
their misery'. One of the strong questions raised in my mind is: Does the killer
really want to put the victim out of their misery? Or is it the killer who is
under the extreme pressures of living with the victim, and is it their own
lifestyle that they are truly fed up with?

In the Robert Latimer case, as in many other cases of euthanasia, it can never
be proven whether or not Latimer killed his young daughter Tracy to "save' her,
or to save himself. While I have never experienced living with someone who is
severely disabled, I have had the chance to discuss the issue with many friends
and associates. From what I have learned, it is, indeed, an extremely tough
matter to deal with. While no-one I have spoken to has been suicidal over the
matter, they have seen the true pain and misery that some severely disabled
individuals are forced to deal with every day of their lives. Still, many agree
with myself on the point that a human life is just that, a human life; and that
everyone alive has the right to live, no matter whether or not it is under
tougher circumstances than another person. Nobody has the right to take the life
of another person, and technically, the law states that nobody has the right to
take their own life as well.

A severely disabled person may have to deal with much pain in their lives, but
they are entitled to the right of simply enjoying being alive, and denying them
that right would be an infringement upon their freedom. Latimer should have
taken the law into deeper consideration before taking his daughters life. He may
have seen the suffering that she went through, but it is evident that he had
some sort of strange love for his daughter. Indeed, he did want "what was best'
for Tracy, but possibly what he was after was what he thought was best. He
valued her rights as his daughter, unfortunately he did not value her rights as
a human being.

As euthanasia is one of the most controversial issues in today's society, up
there with abortion and the legalization of marijuana, there is a close 50/50
opinion base on the topic. Thus, it would seem either extremely difficult for a
jury to make a reasonable call on whether or not Latimer should have been guilty.
As stated in a Toronto Star article from November 19, 1994, "to acquit him…would
have put all disabled people in Canada…at rise of being killed by other who felt
they would be better off dead". This raises an interesting point: would
completely unnecessary murders take place if euthanasia were legalized? Likely.
A killer with a good defence would attempt to prove that they killed a disabled
person to put them out of their misery, when indeed they may have had completely
different, perhaps personal reasons to murder the individual. Our system of laws
is right in finding that to legalize euthanasia would far a massive risk upon
the elderly, sick, and disabled of our society. This is a risk for which a law
should not have to take blame for, and changing this law would only encourage
that.

As for Latimer's sentence; this raises the ever-controversial question of "how
can you put a price on a person's life?'. Will ten years in prison change the
way Latimer feels about his actions? No is the most likely answer to the
question, as Latimer clearly stated "I still feel what I did was right". So what
good is there in putting Latimer away for ten years? Should the sentence be a
harsher one? Possibly, euthanasia should be considered cold-blooded first-degree
style murder, with a full life sentence without parole. I feel that taking the
life of another human is cold-blooded, no matter how you look at it; thus, the
sentence should be that of a greater extent than the one that Latimer received.

In speaking with my parents about this issue, the term "doctor assisted suicide"
was mentioned several times. I felt from where I stand, that it was my duty to
make it clear that there is quite a difference between "doctor assisted suicide"
and the Latimer case. I feel that when a person clearly states that they wish to
be killed peacefully with the help of a professional is an enormously different
matter from a case like Robert Latimer's, in which Latimer took it upon himself
to make the judgment call on his daughter Tracy's life, and decided himself,
that she wished to die. He did not consider Tracy's outlook on the situation.
Indeed, she was unable to communicate with him, and could not let him know how
she felt, but I feel that this in no way gave Latimer the right to decide for
himself that she wished to die.

It is said that many doctors have "played God" in committing doctor assisted
suicides; I believe that Robert Latimer attempted to "play God" when he took his
daughters life into his own hands and started making decisions on her behalf.
While I am in now way recommending suicide, it may have been a better route for
Robert Latimer in his situation. If he had so much rage for the love of his
daughter, and it had to be taken out via murder, I feel it would have been
better if he had taken his own life, as opposed to taking the life of Tracy, who
was simply an innocent girl with a problem beyond her own control.

 

Other sample model essays:

Politics / Euthanasia
Euthanasia Euthanasia means gentle or easy death for those who are incurably ill and in pain. So should a person have the right to take another person's life or his own when he/she is incurab...
Euthanasia: A Question of Ethics Euthanasia is one of the most acute and uncomfortable contemporary problems in medical ethics. Is Euthanasia Ethical? The case for euthanasia rests on on...
Politics / Falsely Accused
Falsely Accused What has to happen before the media quits jumping to conclusions about news stories ? It makes you wonder about the possibility of legal restrictions on the amount of infor...
Politics / The FBI
The FBI To uphold the law through the investigation of violations of federal riminal law; to protect the U.S. from foreign intelligence and terrorist activities; to provide leadership and law...
Politics / Fraud
Fraud What is a Fraud? A fraud is when one party deceives or takes unfair advantage of another. A fraud includes any act, omission, or concealment, involving a breach of legal or equitable...
Governement's Bureaucratic Half-Witted Laws Todays big government is a typical display of bureaucracy in its most creative state. Due to the enormous bureaucracy within todays state gover...
Greenspan - The Case for the Defense My fascination with the Judicial System Structure of todays society was furthered and strengthened after reading and analyzing the works of Edward Gree...
Gun Control: Against The government has placed many gun control laws, but some of the laws were made to make the general public feel safer. For instance the government banned a handful of...
Problems with Gun Control "If the second amendment does not mean what it says, what about the first?", this was the question asked by author, and National Rifle Association member, Bill Cl...
Politics / Gun Control
Gun Control Gun control has been a hot topic for very long time. People on the anti- gun control side believe that gun ownership is a Constitutional right backed by the Second Amendm...
Experience with Dream Essay - Reliable and great customer service. Quality of work - High quality of work.
, ,
Dream Essay - Very reliable and great customer service. Encourage other to try their service. Writer 91463 - Provided a well written Annotated Bibliography with great deal of detail per th
, ,
it is always perfect
, ,
The experience with Dream Essay is stress free. Service is excellent and forms various forms of communication all help with customer service. Dream Essay is customer oriented. Writer 17663
, ,
Only competent & proven writers
Original writing — no plagiarism
Our papers are never resold or reused, period
Satisfaction guarantee — free unlimited revisions
Client-friendly money back guarantee
Total confidentiality & privacy
Guaranteed deadlines
Live Chat & 24/7 customer support
All academic and professional subjects
All difficulty levels
12pt Times New Roman font, double spaced, 1 inch margins
The fastest turnaround in the industry
Fully documented research — free bibliography guaranteed
Fax (additional info): 866-332-0244
Fax (additional info): 866-308-7123
Live Chat Support
Need order related assistance?—Click here to submit a inquiry
© Dreamessays.com. All Rights Reserved.
Dreamessays.com is the property of MEDIATECH LTD