+ 1-888-787-5890  
   + 1-302-351-4405  
 
 
 
 

Essay/Term paper: The micmac v.s. the iroquois

Essay, term paper, research paper:  Politics

Free essays available online are good but they will not follow the guidelines of your particular writing assignment. If you need a custom term paper on Politics: The Micmac V.S. The Iroquois, you can hire a professional writer here to write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written essays will pass any plagiarism test. Our writing service will save you time and grade.



The Micmac V.S. The Iroquois


Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal
groups, they have many differences as well as similarities. One area of such, is
their traditional justice systems. Their governments and laws are in some ways
similar, but in many ways different.
The Micmac reside in what is now Nova Scotia, eastern New Brunswick,
Prince Edward Island, and southern Gaspe. The territory was subdivided in to
seven districts. Each of these districts contained family groupings in small
settlements based on hunting and fishing. Those from P.E.I. held more territory
in common than any other Micmac district. Their land was allotted by family.
The Iroquois were a agricultural people. They lived in permanent
villages in a domain now called southern Ontario, southern Quebec, and
northeastern United States. Indian Nations living here formed a formal and
lasting confederacy by 1450. Their members were called "Ho-De-No-Sau-Nee'. The
league was called "Kanonsionni', meaning EXTENDED HOUSE. The first five nations
to join the confederacy were Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca.
Tuscaroras migrated from Carolina and joined the confederacy in 1722. The
Iroquois are bound in a treaty of friendship with the Ojibway to the North.
The Micmac government was three-tiered, with local, district, and
national chiefs, or "Sagamores'. Each settlement's council of elders chose a
local chief. The chief was the focus of power in the settlement. The local chief
attained position through both hereditary right and meritorious behavior. The
oldest son of a dead chief was usually given first consideration as a successor.
If he was found unfit for office, despite special training, others in family
and/or others in the community were considered. These chiefs usually had two
assistants or captains. These were called second and third watchers. They would
assume command from a sick or incompetent chief. The local chiefs would convene
in a district council and select one of their numbers to preside over their
meetings and represent the regions' interests. Councils usually met in the
spring or fall, and all decisions were based on unanimity.
District Sagamores made up the governing body of the Micmac nation. One
district chief would act as Grand Chief. All three of these types of
chieftainship followed bloodlines as a natural course of leadership ascendency.
The people expected their chief to be a man of intelligence, knowledge, dignity,
courage, generosity, an able hunter, and fearless warrior. Leaders ruled through
impeccable example, not force.
The Iroquois confederacy was formalized by a constitution, recorded on
wampum belts to preserve the understanding for all generations to follow. Each
nation retained its own council and managed its own local affairs. General
control was to be lodged in a federal senate, composed of representatives
elected by each nation, holding office during good behavior, and acknowledged as
ruling chiefs throughout the whole confederacy. Every nation was further
subdivided into clans. Each clan discussed a matter to be brought before the
federal council, followed by unanimous agreement between clans. The head chief
would then announce the vote of his nation in the league council.
In the Iroquois society, fifty "sachem ships" were created, these men
represented their nation's interests on the general council, while continuing to
exercise leadership at the local level. Together they formed the executive,
legislative, and judicial authority of the league. Although each nation
possessed unique responsibility in the confederacy, no sachem had greater rights
than another. Onondaga had 14 representatives; the Cayuga, 10; the Mohawk and
Oneida, nine; and the Seneca, eight. All council decisions were unanimous.
Onondaga as the fire-keepers (chairman) and the Mohawks as the founders of the
league , had the special duty and right of preventing a decision from passing if
it was harmful to the people. The two head Seneca chiefs were stationed at the
door of the council room, to prevent any unwanted motion from proceeding.
Iroquois women held other powers in their communities. All member
nations were matriarchal. All goods, titles, and rights followed the female line
of descent. The elder women were the heads of the families. The women had
orators representing them at council meetings, or they spoke directly through a
chief. In times of war, women were peace makes by right and duty.
A distinction existed between Iroquois leaders in times of peace and
during wars. A sachem could not participate in a battle in his official capacity.
Constitution specified that each sachem have a war chief and a runner to bring
tidings; in war, the sachem was to step down and be replaced by the war chief
until hostilities ended. The war chief acted as an advisor to his sachem in
peace, his words carry considerable weight. The lesser chiefs, or captains as
they were occasionally called, existed in Iroquois villages. These chiefs were
intermediaries between the sachems and their people, and grew in influence. Men
were awarded these positions according to merit, family rank being of no
consequence. A warrior who assisted the chiefs capably, and who was trustworthy
and honest, was appointed chief by the others. The lesser chieftainships were
not hereditary. The chiefs were governed by requests to their people, rather
than with orders; it appears that they possessed no powers of force other than
public sentiment and tradition. Leaders were careful to ask nothing that might
likely meet with refusal. Their decisions were, on the whole, willingly carried
out; creating an orderly, but liberal society. They developed a unique system of
government that combined hereditary and elective elements. Principle chiefs were
chosen by the women, who weren't eligible to become chiefs themselves. They were
likely to select leaders with no other consideration but the good of the nation.

The moral fibre of the Iroquois community was guarded by "keepers of the
faith", widely respected men and women selected from the populace. On election
as a keeper of the faith, a citizen was duty-bound to accept and adopt a new
name. The office could be relinquished. They reported evil deeds of individuals
to the council, to make them an example by exposure. They sometimes held
consultations to deliberate upon the moral condition of the people.
Both the Iroquois and Micmac cultures honored presents as a form of
reconciliation. They both saw murder as terrible. Although punishment and
reconciliation were the same, Micmac distinguished between murder, manslaughter,
and accidental death. War was different between the cultures. If someone of the
Micmac were killed in war, the opposing could bring presents, be killed, or
sometimes, adopted by the victims family. If someone of the Iroquois was killed
by an opposing tribe, it would start a war. This death could also be reconciled
by the gift of presents, or punishable by death or adoption by the clan mother.
In the Micmac society, trespassing was a serious offence and punishable
by reconciliation by the wronged. The Iroquois had no such thing as trespassing.
Everyone owned everything. Only spiritual articles were personally owned. If
these items were stolen, the punishment was ridicule or anger. New Year's Eve
was the only time theft was permitted. Both cultures took in and cared for the
poor and unfortunate. Both cultures also killed their old and ill but for
reasons. Iroquois did because of burden, and Micmac did it to relieve pain and
suffering.
In Micmac society, marriages were preformed in the summer and courtship
was strict. The Iroquois could marry at anytime. Polygamy was okay in Micmac
society and was not in Iroquois society. Adultery was rare in the Iroquois
society and punishable by whipping or mutilization. In Micmac--marriage of an
uncle, cousin, siblings and nieces and nephews, was forbidden. In the Iroquois
society, marriage to anyone within the clan was forbidden.
In Iroquois society, witchcraft was the most serious offence. If the
person could not be reformed, they were put to death. Treason was just as bad
and punishable the same as witchcraft. The clan mother can remove a chief for
violating sacred trust of his people and committed a crime. Small offenses were
punishable by ostracism. Iroquois also believed offenses brought evil, such as
drought, famine, or other scourge upon entire community. The planting festival
was used for all to confess any transgressions that could have angered the Great
Spirit.
Although there are many similarities between both the Micmac and the
Iroquois, there are some differences that make them separate communities. The
government and laws are only a small part of what unites these communities as
Aboriginals, but separates them as communities. The Micmac V.S. The
Iroquois



Although the Micmac and the Iroquois Confederacy are both Aboriginal
groups, they have many differences as well as similarities. One area of such, is
their traditional justice systems. Their governments and laws are in some ways
similar, but in many ways different.
The Micmac reside in what is now Nova Scotia, eastern New Brunswick,
Prince Edward Island, and southern Gaspe. The territory was subdivided in to
seven districts. Each of these districts contained family groupings in small
settlements based on hunting and fishing. Those from P.E.I. held more territory
in common than any other Micmac district. Their land was allotted by family.
The Iroquois were a agricultural people. They lived in permanent
villages in a domain now called southern Ontario, southern Quebec, and
northeastern United States. Indian Nations living here formed a formal and
lasting confederacy by 1450. Their members were called "Ho-De-No-Sau-Nee'. The
league was called "Kanonsionni', meaning EXTENDED HOUSE. The first five nations
to join the confederacy were Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca.
Tuscaroras migrated from Carolina and joined the confederacy in 1722. The
Iroquois are bound in a treaty of friendship with the Ojibway to the North.
The Micmac government was three-tiered, with local, district, and
national chiefs, or "Sagamores'. Each settlement's council of elders chose a
local chief. The chief was the focus of power in the settlement. The local chief
attained position through both hereditary right and meritorious behavior. The
oldest son of a dead chief was usually given first consideration as a successor.
If he was found unfit for office, despite special training, others in family
and/or others in the community were considered. These chiefs usually had two
assistants or captains. These were called second and third watchers. They would
assume command from a sick or incompetent chief. The local chiefs would convene
in a district council and select one of their numbers to preside over their
meetings and represent the regions' interests. Councils usually met in the
spring or fall, and all decisions were based on unanimity.
District Sagamores made up the governing body of the Micmac nation. One
district chief would act as Grand Chief. All three of these types of
chieftainship followed bloodlines as a natural course of leadership ascendency.
The people expected their chief to be a man of intelligence, knowledge, dignity,
courage, generosity, an able hunter, and fearless warrior. Leaders ruled through
impeccable example, not force.
The Iroquois confederacy was formalized by a constitution, recorded on
wampum belts to preserve the understanding for all generations to follow. Each
nation retained its own council and managed its own local affairs. General
control was to be lodged in a federal senate, composed of representatives
elected by each nation, holding office during good behavior, and acknowledged as
ruling chiefs throughout the whole confederacy. Every nation was further
subdivided into clans. Each clan discussed a matter to be brought before the
federal council, followed by unanimous agreement between clans. The head chief
would then announce the vote of his nation in the league council.
In the Iroquois society, fifty "sachem ships" were created, these men
represented their nation's interests on the general council, while continuing to
exercise leadership at the local level. Together they formed the executive,
legislative, and judicial authority of the league. Although each nation
possessed unique responsibility in the confederacy, no sachem had greater rights
than another. Onondaga had 14 representatives; the Cayuga, 10; the Mohawk and
Oneida, nine; and the Seneca, eight. All council decisions were unanimous.
Onondaga as the fire-keepers (chairman) and the Mohawks as the founders of the
league , had the special duty and right of preventing a decision from passing if
it was harmful to the people. The two head Seneca chiefs were stationed at the
door of the council room, to prevent any unwanted motion from proceeding.
Iroquois women held other powers in their communities. All member
nations were matriarchal. All goods, titles, and rights followed the female line
of descent. The elder women were the heads of the families. The women had
orators representing them at council meetings, or they spoke directly through a
chief. In times of war, women were peace makes by right and duty.
A distinction existed between Iroquois leaders in times of peace and
during wars. A sachem could not participate in a battle in his official capacity.
Constitution specified that each sachem have a war chief and a runner to bring
tidings; in war, the sachem was to step down and be replaced by the war chief
until hostilities ended. The war chief acted as an advisor to his sachem in
peace, his words carry considerable weight. The lesser chiefs, or captains as
they were occasionally called, existed in Iroquois villages. These chiefs were
intermediaries between the sachems and their people, and grew in influence. Men
were awarded these positions according to merit, family rank being of no
consequence. A warrior who assisted the chiefs capably, and who was trustworthy
and honest, was appointed chief by the others. The lesser chieftainships were
not hereditary. The chiefs were governed by requests to their people, rather
than with orders; it appears that they possessed no powers of force other than
public sentiment and tradition. Leaders were careful to ask nothing that might
likely meet with refusal. Their decisions were, on the whole, willingly carried
out; creating an orderly, but liberal society. They developed a unique system of
government that combined hereditary and elective elements. Principle chiefs were
chosen by the women, who weren't eligible to become chiefs themselves. They were
likely to select leaders with no other consideration but the good of the nation.

The moral fibre of the Iroquois community was guarded by "keepers of the
faith", widely respected men and women selected from the populace. On election
as a keeper of the faith, a citizen was duty-bound to accept and adopt a new
name. The office could be relinquished. They reported evil deeds of individuals
to the council, to make them an example by exposure. They sometimes held
consultations to deliberate upon the moral condition of the people.
Both the Iroquois and Micmac cultures honored presents as a form of
reconciliation. They both saw murder as terrible. Although punishment and
reconciliation were the same, Micmac distinguished between murder, manslaughter,
and accidental death. War was different between the cultures. If someone of the
Micmac were killed in war, the opposing could bring presents, be killed, or
sometimes, adopted by the victims family. If someone of the Iroquois was killed
by an opposing tribe, it would start a war. This death could also be reconciled
by the gift of presents, or punishable by death or adoption by the clan mother.
In the Micmac society, trespassing was a serious offence and punishable
by reconciliation by the wronged. The Iroquois had no such thing as trespassing.
Everyone owned everything. Only spiritual articles were personally owned. If
these items were stolen, the punishment was ridicule or anger. New Year's Eve
was the only time theft was permitted. Both cultures took in and cared for the
poor and unfortunate. Both cultures also killed their old and ill but for
reasons. Iroquois did because of burden, and Micmac did it to relieve pain and
suffering.
In Micmac society, marriages were preformed in the summer and courtship
was strict. The Iroquois could marry at anytime. Polygamy was okay in Micmac
society and was not in Iroquois society. Adultery was rare in the Iroquois
society and punishable by whipping or mutilization. In Micmac--marriage of an
uncle, cousin, siblings and nieces and nephews, was forbidden. In the Iroquois
society, marriage to anyone within the clan was forbidden.
In Iroquois society, witchcraft was the most serious offence. If the
person could not be reformed, they were put to death. Treason was just as bad
and punishable the same as witchcraft. The clan mother can remove a chief for
violating sacred trust of his people and committed a crime. Small offenses were
punishable by ostracism. Iroquois also believed offenses brought evil, such as
drought, famine, or other scourge upon entire community. The planting festival
was used for all to confess any transgressions that could have angered the Great
Spirit.
Although there are many similarities between both the Micmac and the
Iroquois, there are some differences that make them separate communities. The
government and laws are only a small part of what unites these communities as
Aboriginals, but separates them as communities.

 

Other sample model essays:

The Paradox of Community "One can see that insiders are caught in the paradox of community: The same cultural vocabulary that undermines community is simultaneously that community's idiom...
The Police Exception and the Domestic Abuse Law Beating a spouse is wrong. Fighting is wrong. Domestic Abuse is wrong. This is a very simple concept and lawmakers, police officers, and cit...
The Positive And Negative Effects of DNA Profiling Justin Broyles Apr. 12, 1995 Justice Theory Lance Miller Genetic engineering has developed and blossomed at a frightening rate ...
The Right To A Free Trial One of the most important freedoms in the American judicial system is the right to a jury trial. This allows a minimum of six Americans, chosen from a list of re...
The War of Freedom of Expression "Taking on anti-Semites and Holocaust deniers in the sanctified courtroom environment is like responding to someone who calls your mother a prostitute. B...
Tinker v. Des Moines, Kuhlmieir v. Hazelwood Scott Nagao 3/10/97 Period 7 About 32 years ago, in December of 1965, a group of adults and students from Des Moines, Iowa gathered to show t...
Politics / Tragedy
Tragedy As Aristotle says, "Tragedy is an imitation not of human beings but of action, life, happiness, and unhappiness." Very few of the great tragedies could possibly be based in realit...
"The world today seems to be going crazy": The Unabomber's Manifesto It was May 25th 1978, Terry Marker was on his usual patrol on campus at the University of Illinois. This earmark packa...
Uniforms In School Uniforms should definitely be used in school systems. Everything about it makes sense. Not everyone is going to be happy about it at first, but they will slowly ...
Politics / Violence
Violence Violence. Mentioning the word conjures up images of assault, abuse, and even murder. In today's American society, violence is more prevalent now then ever. Annually, we see vio...
Experience with Dream Essay - Reliable and great customer service. Quality of work - High quality of work.
, ,
Dream Essay - Very reliable and great customer service. Encourage other to try their service. Writer 91463 - Provided a well written Annotated Bibliography with great deal of detail per th
, ,
it is always perfect
, ,
The experience with Dream Essay is stress free. Service is excellent and forms various forms of communication all help with customer service. Dream Essay is customer oriented. Writer 17663
, ,
Only competent & proven writers
Original writing — no plagiarism
Our papers are never resold or reused, period
Satisfaction guarantee — free unlimited revisions
Client-friendly money back guarantee
Total confidentiality & privacy
Guaranteed deadlines
Live Chat & 24/7 customer support
All academic and professional subjects
All difficulty levels
12pt Times New Roman font, double spaced, 1 inch margins
The fastest turnaround in the industry
Fully documented research — free bibliography guaranteed
Fax (additional info): 866-332-0244
Fax (additional info): 866-308-7123
Live Chat Support
Need order related assistance?—Click here to submit a inquiry
© Dreamessays.com. All Rights Reserved.
Dreamessays.com is the property of MEDIATECH LTD